A walkthrough of how the Understory product team is organised, how we decide what to build, how work flows from idea to launch — and how the rest of the company plugs in.
One product team, the disciplines inside it, and the leaders who own each lens.
Strategy → outcomes → initiatives. Foundation vs Frontier, and how we invest.
Building ahead, the shaping process, keeping the product healthy, and our rituals.
Product opportunities, LaunchPad, the Insights Dashboard, and how to work with us.
A quick primer on the vocabulary you'll hear today — it shows up everywhere in how we work.
The future of experience management.
Imagine a platform that doesn't just automate admin, booking, and payments but redefines the way experiences are created and shared.
A platform that transforms data into actionable, game-changing insights.
A platform that gives you a team of AI-driven specialists working around the clock ensuring every guest is reached, heard, and supported.
But our product vision goes beyond tools and transactions. We're building the world's first ecosystem where experience creators are empowered to dream, create, and grow.
Ultimately, Understory will be the most powerful business-in-a-box tool ever seen, enabling independent experience creators building thriving and profitable businesses.
This is the future of Understory. It's time to build.
Engineers, designers, product managers and leadership are all part of one team working toward one product vision — one framework, one shared language. The functional groups are disciplines, not separate teams.
The VPs are functional leaders — their responsibility spans the entire product, not one initiative. Each guards one lens of quality.

Strategy, portfolio & the roadmap. Sets the Foundation/Frontier ratio. Final call on what we build.

Product Management + commercial & Go-To-Market. All PMs report here.

Design, research, quality & coherence. Owns the Leaf design system.

Technical excellence, architecture & delivery. All engineers report here.
Our process is a stack of layers. The most common failure mode is skipping one — jumping from strategy straight to building without defining the outcome.
Powering 1,000,000 experience hosts by 2030.
These are fundamentally different in nature, so we don't prioritise them against each other. Instead we protect a ratio of capacity between them, set by the CPTO.
Deepening & extending the known product surface. Not maintenance — active construction. It compounds over time.
"Foundation is our evolution."
Creating entirely new product surfaces — capabilities that change what Understory is or can become. Higher risk, longer horizon.
"Frontier has the potential to be a revolution."
Neither is more important. When a Frontier bet matures and proves itself, it graduates into the Foundation.
A focused work stream with a mission, an owner, allocated seats and success metrics. It describes a problem space we're investing in — not a solution.
A deliberate, time-bound investment where the outcome is uncertain but the upside justifies the risk. Frontier initiatives are bets almost by definition.
A scoped piece of work inside an initiative — a defined deliverable, a timeline, and a clear definition of done. People work on one project at a time.
Appetite is how much we're willing to invest in a problem — measured in time and number of people. It's our working proxy for cost, and how we signal what matters most.
How we spread our people and time across initiatives is our statement of priorities — and we never take on more than we can staff.
We build ahead of the market — so we're never selling something we don't have. Product researches and shapes for the next quarter while Commercial sells what's live today.
"We build ahead, so Commercial can hit the ground running."
Live on our Product Insights Dashboard. The roadmap is expressed as now / soon / later bets & initiatives — not a feature list with dates.
Each opportunity is shaped from three perspectives before it's built — experience, commercial, and technical feasibility — and an appetite is set against its potential impact.
Leadership sources a long-list, synthesised into a prioritised short-list.
VP PX shapes the journey; VP Product shapes pricing & GTM. Appetite set.
VP Eng adds feasibility. Trade-offs & scope within the appetite.
Design, scope maps, success metrics & GTM finalised.
Pitches in Linear — the source of truth — with launch tracked alongside.
Insight from across the company isn't just welcome — it's an integral signal in what we decide to build. Leadership synthesises these signals; the work itself then lives in Linear.
Plus customer & commercial data from HubSpot. Ideas, signals, bugs and requests — captured openly, not in DMs.
Leadership synthesises all the signals and decides what to take forward — weighing each one against strategy and the whole customer base.
A rotating triage role in Product. Its job: make sure every incoming bug or request gets seen, classified and prioritised — keeping the Triage queue at zero. It's a triage role: the Groundskeeper assigns and judges priority, not necessarily fixes.
Urgent. Assigned immediately and fixed within 48 hours.
Logged and resolved within 7 days — the absolute maximum.
A feature request → backlog, deduplicated to track real demand.
Edge cases (e.g. a 2011 iPad) get closed.
Reports arrive via the Linear Triage queue and #bug-reports; the role rotates weekly. Not sure who's on duty? Just tag @groundskeeper in Slack and the right person gets pinged. Spot something broken or hear a request? Create a ticket — it feeds straight into our PFI.
Beyond each initiative's own metrics, three product-health metrics map to the three lenses of quality. Reviewed monthly — a deterioration can trigger a re-allocation of seats, even mid-quarter.
Viability — how effectively we capture value. Driven by VP Product.
Feasibility — the Product Friction Index (0–100): feature gaps + bug friction. VP Eng & VP PX.
More on this next →Desirability — would customers recommend us. Not currently tracked — a deliberate prioritisation.
Together: are we commercially viable, technically sound, and loved by customers?
PFI is a single 0–100 score — the lower, the healthier the product. It blends two kinds of friction and is reviewed monthly. No maths required to read it.
The feature-gap side. If lots of customers ask for the same few things, we're missing something core. If requests are spread out, the product is solid. Sourced from customer requests in Linear.
The bug side. How many bugs, how severe, and — most importantly — how fast we fix them against our targets. Slow fixes on critical bugs hurt the score most.
Two levers move it down: ship the features people actually ask for, and fix bugs fast.
Progress is posted in #project-updates — followable at opportunity and initiative level.
Are bets on track? Where launch & product-health data is reviewed across the portfolio.
Agree next quarter's initiatives and set the Foundation/Frontier ratio. CPTO makes the final call.
Present active bets and recommend continue / pivot / kill at major milestones.
Released = the code is in production. Launched = we've made deliberate effort to drive adoption. A feature that's released but not launched is an investment without a return.
Features ship to production as they're ready through the quarter — but we don't fire the commercial machine for each one. The coordinated launch wave begins at the start of the next quarter.
Launch thinking is embedded in shaping from the start and tracked in Linear — every launch gets an evaluation. No exceptions.
The same vocabulary applies at every level — what differs is the scope, the owner, and the decisions being made. Distribution is treated as part of the build, from the quarter down to the project.
Aggregate the quarter's initiatives, resolve conflicts, and lock the launch timeline & paid-channel budget.
Make distribution part of the initiative's outcome. Bundle & sequence the launches of its projects.
The operational plan: audiences → tier → channels → formats → timeline.
Each level enforces launch-accountability for the work beneath it — and each gets its own evaluation.
One place for everyone to see what Product is working on right now — the current initiatives, their status, and the opportunities & projects in flight beneath them.
The current initiatives and how each one is tracking.
What we're actively working on under each initiative, and its status.
A roadmap view — for the current quarter only.
Product-health metrics like PFI aren't in there yet — a candidate for a future addition.
We'll take any information we can get — the problem, the customer, the evidence — and use it to shape the solution we believe is right.
As VP Product, he carries commercial context into shaping and owns Go-To-Market. Commercial signals route through here.
The roadmap is problem spaces in priority order — not dated features. Solutions are discovered inside initiatives.
Drop ideas in #product-opportunities; ask in #product-information; report bugs in #bug-reports.
We plan a quarter ahead — so the best time to raise something is early, before cycle planning, not mid-build.
The "How to Product" playbook, Product Process & LaunchPad live in Notion.
The current initiatives, roadmap & live work on the Product Insights Dashboard — insights.understory.sh.
Questions in #product-information · ideas in #product-opportunities.
We build great product — but building it isn't enough. People need to know about it, understand it, and use it.